A new Git branch makes sense in which situation?

A new Git branch makes sense in which situation?

• A. You are working alone
• B. You are working on multiple sets of features at once
• C. You have completed your previous project
• D. You are documenting existing code

Answer: (B)

Creating a new Git branch is particularly advantageous when you are working on multiple sets of features at once. This practice allows you to isolate changes related to each feature, preventing them from interfering with one another. By using separate branches, you can develop and test each feature independently, making it easier to manage large projects where multiple features may be under development simultaneously. This approach also enhances collaboration when working in teams, as changes can be reviewed and integrated more smoothly through pull requests when each feature is neatly encapsulated in its own branch. This isolation also simplifies the process of reverting changes if something doesn’t work as expected, as you can simply delete the branch without impacting other ongoing work. The alternative scenarios do not provide the same level of benefit for branch creation. When working alone, for instance, it may be less critical to create separate branches since there’s no need to isolate changes from others. Similarly, completing a project typically means you would merge your changes back into the main branch rather than starting a new one, and documenting existing code doesn't usually require branching as it doesn’t involve active development of features.

Creating a new Git branch is particularly advantageous when you are working on multiple sets of features at once. This practice allows you to isolate changes related to each feature, preventing them from interfering with one another. By using separate branches, you can develop and test each feature independently, making it easier to manage large projects where multiple features may be under development simultaneously.

This approach also enhances collaboration when working in teams, as changes can be reviewed and integrated more smoothly through pull requests when each feature is neatly encapsulated in its own branch. This isolation also simplifies the process of reverting changes if something doesn’t work as expected, as you can simply delete the branch without impacting other ongoing work.

The alternative scenarios do not provide the same level of benefit for branch creation. When working alone, for instance, it may be less critical to create separate branches since there’s no need to isolate changes from others. Similarly, completing a project typically means you would merge your changes back into the main branch rather than starting a new one, and documenting existing code doesn't usually require branching as it doesn’t involve active development of features.